Thursday, September 30, 2004

The First Debate

Tonight was the first debate between Bush and Kerry.

The biggest thing that bothers me right now is for months the Bush campaign has taken a line from the Democratic primaries and used it as a slogan for their re-election.

It is amazing the only thing the President of the United States has going for him in this election is the idea that his challenger shifts positions.

Are there really people out there...

Who can say they have not changed their mind on important professional and/or personal matters.

Are there really conservatives out there,

That admire people who will not admit when they are wrong?

That admire someone who will not take responsibility, or make a retraction when they have publicized false and inaccurates as fact?(No I'm not talking about Dan Rather, he's admitted his mistake)

Let me say now, I have never supported the war in Iraq.

I remember vividly discussing this with a conservative "evangelical Christian" co-worker back home in Little Rock, AR back in late 2002 and early 2003 during the arms inspections and debates leading up to the war.

I told her then, (of course she was for the war) and will say it now, "We were gonna go to war with Iraq whether the American people wanted it or not. I do not trust the President."
I shared with her that I was suspicious, (well to put it bluntly "I don't believe that shit") of the intelligence reports that Iraq had "weapons of mass destruction".

I don't know why it is so difficult for some people to believe that government agencies under the direction of the President of the United States have and will commit crimes and lie to the people(Watergate).


The war, which we know now, there wasn't a chance in hell there would be a war with Iraq, we actually went to war in(not with) Iraq. I believe the President knew Saddam was not capable of a war against the United States. He thought it was going to be an easy win and that there would not be any opposition to US occupation.

I believe he did not plan and was not prepared for the insurgency. And make no doubt about it, there will be a civil war in Iraq.

Tonights debate did not move me. I was pretty much decided after it was confirmed that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.

We find out that even scientists that led Iraqs nuclear weapons research program admit that Saddam's program has been disarmed since as early as 1991.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4485970

I did not want to be right about the weapons being some made up justification for the war.
The conservatives spin these scientists like Jafar Dhia Jafar as their see, he did too have weapons guy.

DUH!?

Since you're gonna be too much of a wimp to say it, I'll say it for you, Saddam was not a THREAT!!!

Mr. President, would you and your spin masters please stop spinning the subject of the campaign away from your failed domestic policies? The state of economy needs addressing.

Within the last few days several major companies with high paying tech jobs have announced thousands of lay-offs.

Computer Associates-900, Motorola-1000, AT&T-10,000( AT&T Lay-Offs), Nortel-3250, EDS-20,000 (over next 2 yrs EDS Annoucement)

Read 'em and weep!!

Second debate (Veeps) coming up October 5, 2004!!!

Saturday, September 25, 2004

Same Sex Unions

Well I promised to write on this subject and what better time than the present?

Recently there have been stories about a mailer sent out by the Republican Party to Arkansas(my home state).

In this mailer the RNC claims that if conservatives(the target of this mailer was Christian conservatives) don't get out and vote, the Bible will be banned and same sex marriages will be legalized.

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/9748985.htm?1c

I'm ot even going to comment on the madness of believing that the Bible could one day be banned. Though, we have allowed the government to ban books, movies, paintings, and other forms of personal and religious expression and art in the past on the grounds of moral obscenity. Crusaders for these types of bans have been warned too often that eventually their own expression would stand at risk of being banned.

My opinion on same sex unions?

I have found this to be a very controversial subject. Even among my friends that I consider the most open minded, this subject without a doubt turns them into religious right leaning fanatics!

I am for the right of adults in serious relationships having a right to form a legal and binding contract with each other.

I am for this right even for couples of the same sex.

The general basis I find that most of my frieds agree with. That if you are dating someone and you have become serious, but really don't want the ceremony and spiritual binding that is constituted upon your union by the church, you and your significant other should have the right to a civil union. But, if this is about couples of the same sex, I have found that the idea sickens these same friends. Lots of people just feel that homosexual relationships are not right.

I have found however that they can agree to this under a certain set of circumstances...for example.

You have a good paying job with benefits and your sibling/relative or best friend of the same sex does not. You work for a company that recognizes life partners and extends benefits to these partners as well as their dependents.

These same friends see no problem with the same sex union if it is to allow a friend or relative to qualify for benefits.

What do you think?

Are you for or against same sex unions?

Do you feel there should be federal or local laws that prohibit same sex unions?